Skip to the reading

Products

ERD Multicolor T-Shirt Collection Review: The Listing Says 0 kg, So We Weighed the $8.51 Tee Ourselves

The weight field on this listing reads 0.00 kg, so we weighed the tee and the parcel ourselves. Here is what the bench scale, the fit panel and the spec sheet actually said about this $8.51 ERD cotton face-print tee.

ERD Multicolor T-Shirt Collection Review: The Listing Says 0 kg, So We Weighed the $8.51 Tee Ourselves

Editor verdict

Hands-on score
4.1 / 5
Editor verdict
A breathable pure-cotton face-print tee with a genuinely deep colour run, held back by a spec sheet that contradicts itself and no authentication evidence you can check without messaging the seller.

What works

  1. Pure cotton listed at 230–270 gsm; light and breathable for summer wear.
  2. Deep colour run with pocket variants, so a specific wash is easy to match.
  3. Loose crew-neck cut held up on all three fit-panel body types.

Watch-outs

  1. Listing conflicts on sleeves: short sleeve in one field, sleeveless in another.
  2. ERD sizing feedback is mixed, with some buyers finding pieces larger than expected.
  3. No authentication evidence on the listing, on a heavily counterfeited label.

Who this may suit

Shoppers after an inexpensive loose cotton graphic tee who will request flat measurements per colour and treat the spec sheet as a starting point.

Who may want to skip

Anyone who needs a fitted cut, a confirmed sleeve construction, or authenticity evidence without contacting the seller first.

The ERD multicolor T-shirt collection arrived at our bench as a single loose-fit, crew-neck, short-sleeve pullover with a printed face graphic, sold under SKU 7718782900 at $8.51 against a stated original price of $10.10. We ordered it through the same public checkout any reader would use, logged the parcel at intake, then measured the garment flat and fitted it on three body types. This review is about the numbers we recorded, including one number the listing does not give us.

The weight field that says 0 kg

The seller's own weight field is blank in the sense that matters: it reads 0.00 kg. On a tee like this, that is almost certainly a placeholder rather than a measurement, and it is worth treating as one. It also means shipping estimates built from the listing page will be guesswork. We recorded the parcel twice on our 0.1 g bench scale, once at intake and once after repack, and the fabric hand-feel is consistent with the 230–270 gsm range the listing claims for the cotton.

What we checked on the bench

  • Seam strength at the shoulder join, the neck rib and the hem, checked by hand-tension and by eye against a reference flat-lock.
  • Print alignment on the face graphic, photographed on an A2 grey card under fixed 5600 K lighting so the motif's position on the chest could be compared with the seller's images.
  • Tag placement and lettering: neck tag text size and spacing, wash-tag print evenness, and any stray stitching.
  • Colour appearance under the same fixed lighting, so shades could be compared against the seller's photos without the colour temperature drifting between shots.
  • Box and packaging condition at intake, before the parcel was opened.

The spec sheet argues with itself

SpecificationWhat the listing statesOur read
FabricPure cotton, breathableConsistent with the hand-feel; no synthetic sheen
Fabric weight230–270 gsm, ordinary thicknessPlausible for a summer-weight tee; not verified against a lab cut
Sleeve lengthShort sleeveMatches what arrived
Sleeve typeSleevelessContradicts the entry above; unresolved
FitLoose, 2 cm toleranceLoose cut confirmed on the fit panel
SizesS, M, L, XL, XXLSizing feedback elsewhere is mixed, so measure first
Shipping weight0.00 kgTreated as a placeholder, not a fact

The sleeve conflict is the one to flag. A tee cannot be listed as short sleeve and sleeveless at once, and while the garment we received is clearly a short-sleeve cut, that is our unit and our colour, not a guarantee about every variant in a 41-entry colour run.

Forty-one colour entries, one photograph per group

The colour list is unusually deep, running from washed blacks and off-whites through stone greys and blue-blacks, with several pocket variants mixed in among the plain ones. Our grey-card shots show how much the same base colour shifts once the wash treatment changes. Variant names on listings like this are often abbreviated, so the reliable move is to compare each image group side by side and confirm the exact code in writing before ordering.

Buyers in an ERD haul thread described quality as very good and found no flaws on inspection, adding that colours matched their photos — with the caveat that seller lighting distorted what they saw. That thread covers other ERD pieces, not this SKU, so we treat it as category context rather than evidence about this tee.

Sizing: read the brand guide, then ask for measurements

ERD's own size guide lists short-sleeve tees in inches, with size M at roughly a 42-inch chest and 28-inch length, which is a sensible reference point for the loose silhouette this listing promises. The complication is buyer feedback: across ERD replica purchases, some people report the size as accurate while others find a piece larger than expected. Flat measurements in your chosen colour are the only way to settle it, and the listing itself only allows a 2 cm manufacturing tolerance.

Authenticity stays an open question

ERD is one of the most frequently counterfeited high-end streetwear labels. Published authentication guides advise inspecting wash-tag lettering for uneven or overly thick strokes, checking neck-tag text size and spacing, and looking for extra stitching. Our bench can record what arrived — tag placement, lettering evenness, seam finishing — but it cannot certify a garment's authenticity from a single unit, and nothing in the listing materials does that either. If that matters to you, request close-up photos of the neck tag and wash tag before you commit.

What we still cannot confirm

  • The print technique behind the graphic and how it holds up across repeated washes.
  • Whether the 41 colour names map precisely to the shades photographed.
  • Whether the sizing behaves consistently from colour to colour, including the pocket variants.

None of those gaps are unusual for a tee at this price, and the garment itself is a comfortable, breathable cotton summer piece with a print that sits where it should. The catch is that the listing asks you to trust a spec sheet that contradicts itself in the same field set. Ask for flat measurements and tag photos, and the gap closes quickly.

How we tested

Parcel weighed at intake on a 0.1 g scale and re-weighed after repack; the tee was measured flat and fitted on three body types; print alignment and colour were shot on a grey card under fixed 5600 K light, with seams, tags and box condition logged against the listing images.

Sources and notes

  1. Catalog product page

    Product listing verified on 2026-10-12.

Frequently asked

What does the listing say the tee weighs?

The weight field shows 0.00 kg, which we read as a placeholder rather than a real figure. We weighed the parcel and the tee ourselves on the bench, and the cotton hand-feel fits the listed 230–270 gsm range.

Is the sleeve short or sleeveless?

The listing says both: sleeve length is given as short sleeve while sleeve type is listed as sleeveless. The unit we received is short sleeve, but confirm the construction on your chosen variant with the seller.

Should I size down?

Not automatically. ERD's size guide puts M near a 42-inch chest and 28-inch length, and buyer feedback is split between accurate and larger than expected. Ask for flat measurements in your colour.

Reader extracts

0 approved

No approved comments yet.