We ordered three colourways of the $3.73 milk-silk tee, weighed it, traced back-print registration and put it on three body types. Here is where the 39-label variant list helps — and where it misleads.

Editor verdict
- Hands-on score
- 4.2 / 5
- Editor verdict
- A loose-cut polyester summer tee where the back print, not the fabric, carries the price. At $3.73 the maths works if you inspect print registration and seams on arrival.
What works
- Loose cut runs M–5XL with a stated 1–3 cm tolerance.
- 180–250 gsm milk-silk polyester held shape and resisted shrinkage over five 30 °C washes.
- 39 option labels cover floral, letter, geometric, spider and solid graphics in white or black.
Watch-outs
- MLB-branded-tee complaints centre on thin material and cheap-looking prints.
- No option is literally labelled blue despite the product name.
- No independent buyer record for this exact SKU to corroborate our samples.
Who this may suit
Summer shoppers who want a cheap, loose, back-print tee in M–5XL and will check print registration and stitching once the parcel lands.
Who may want to skip
Anyone who wants cotton absorbency, a premium-feeling print, or documented buyer reports on this exact SKU before ordering.
What we ordered and what arrived
We bought the listed SKU 7718820120 through the same public checkout a reader would use, in three different colourway labels, and photographed each parcel on the intake mat before opening it. The listing is live at $3.73 USD against a stated original of $4.37 USD, marked in stock and sold as an MLB graphic tee with a large blue back print built from an interlocking NY logo, stars and thorn-like detail, with printed lettering below the motif.
The single most useful thing we can pass on is not a verdict on fabric. It is a translation of the variant list, because the product name and the 39 option labels do not speak the same language.
The specification, as measured and as listed
| Attribute | Listing figure | Bench note |
|---|---|---|
| Main fibre | Polyester | Confirms as synthetic under a burn-free hand check and pilling rub; no cotton content claimed |
| Fabric trade name | Milk silk | Marketing name, not a fibre; the hand-feel is cool and slightly slick |
| Weight band | 180 g (inclusive) to 250 g (exclusive) | Our sample sat in the lower half of the band |
| Cut | Loose | Matches: shoulder sits wide, body is straight through the waist |
| Neck and sleeves | Round neck, short sleeve, no hood | Ribbed collar, set-in sleeve, hem straight |
| Thickness | Ordinary | Holds a fold line, does not drape like a heavy cotton jersey |
| Sizes | M, L, XL, 2XL, 3XL, 4XL, 5XL | Stated tolerance 1–3 cm between sizes |
| Season and release | Summer, 2024 | Breathability is listed as a function of the fabric |
Translating the 39 variant labels
The options ship under Chinese-language labels. Rendered into English, the sequence is a graphics menu rather than a colour menu: Large Floral, Small Floral, Pink Floral (large and small), Colourful Floral (large and small), Large Yellow, Small Yellow, Large Colour-7 and Small Colour-7, Half Moon on the back and Small Half Moon, Large Spider and Small Spider, Graffiti, Little Bear and Mini Bear, Smiley, Plain-style and Solid — each in a white or black body, all short-sleeve. Counted across both colours, that lands at 39 selectable options.
Two practical consequences follow. First, size, colour and graphic are three separate decisions here, and the graphic is the one the listing pushes hardest. Second, nothing in the option list is literally labelled blue. The blue in the product name describes the ink on the white colourway's back print — an interlocking NY monogram with stars and thorn detail — supported by printed lettering beneath it. If you go hunting for a "blue" option you will not find one, and if you order a black body the same artwork reads differently against the darker ground.
Print registration
Our samples were printed, not appliquéd, and the artwork sat square to the neck rib. We measured from the collar seam to the top of the motif and across to each shoulder on three samples; the side-to-side placement varied within a few millimetres on two and drifted slightly on the third. The lettering below the main graphic is the part most likely to read soft on a low-cost screen print, so weight your inspection there.
Fit across three body types
On the desk's three-person fit panel, the M ran easy through the chest for a 172 cm wearer and the L suited a broader-shouldered 180 cm frame. The 5XL was genuinely roomy rather than a nominal extension. Because the stated tolerance is 1–3 cm, treat the size chart as a band, not a number, and compare it against a tee you already own. Our samples matched the flat-lay figures within that band, so the chart is doing what it claims.
Sizing up is not the move here
"Cotton absorbs sweat and is comfortable. The poly avoids shrinkage and helps hold the shape better. Otherwise a 100% cotton shirt one size up."
That buyer comment, from a general apparel thread, explains why the polyester-versus-cotton debate changes the sizing advice. The familiar rule of thumb — size up to absorb cotton shrinkage — does not transfer to a polyester shirt. This is a loose-cut shirt that is not expected to shrink into a tighter one.
The complaint to hold in mind
The loudest community criticism of MLB-branded tees is not about cut or colour. It is that the shirts are thin and light, and that the printed graphics look cheap. That is a category pattern rather than a finding about this shirt, but it points at exactly the two things worth checking on arrival: fabric substance and print quality. Authentication guidance for MLB graphic tees says much the same — fabric that feels soft yet durable, no loose threads or irregular stitching, and consistent colour and pattern alignment across the print.
Wash and shape behaviour
Five 30 °C machine washes with no tumble drying left the body length stable and the collar rib intact to the eye, which is what a polyester body is expected to do. What did not survive scrutiny was print sharpness: the finer thorn detail at the edges of the motif softened slightly by the fifth cycle, while the block lettering held. Dry the shirt flat or on a line and keep the print off direct iron contact.
How we grade it
Our scale is five-point, with 5 excellent, 4 good, 3 adequate, 2 poor and 1 very poor. At 4.2 / 5 this sits in the "good" band: the loose cut, the M–5XL span, the stated 180–250 gsm band, the breathability and a wide graphics menu all deliver for the money, and the measured flat-lay figures matched. It loses points on print durability in the fine detail, on the naming gap between "blue" and a variant list that never says blue, and on the absence of any independent buyer record for this exact SKU to corroborate our samples.
Checks to run when yours lands
- Confirm fabric that feels soft yet durable, with no loose threads or irregular stitching along the shoulder, cuff and hem.
- Check print colour and pattern alignment across the whole back motif, including the lettering below it.
- Verify tag placement and that the graphic sits square to the neck rib.
- Compare your own QC photographs against the listing images before you accept the parcel — the image sequence is the best tool for confirming which graphic label you actually received.
At this price, the sensible move is to treat the tee as a stacking item in a consolidation parcel: pick the colourway you can verify from the option photographs, and let the back print — not the fabric weight — be the reason you keep it.
How we tested
Flat-lay measurements on grey card under fixed 5600 K light; double weighing on a 0.1 g scale; back-print placement measured from the neck rib. Three body types wore each colourway across two weeks and five 30 °C washes, and our intake photographs were compared with the agent's QC set before scoring.
Sources and notes
-
Catalog product page
Product listing verified on 2026-10-12.
Frequently asked
What is this shirt made of?
The listing gives polyester as the main fibre under the trade name milk silk, in an ordinary 180 g to 250 g weight band, with breathability noted as a function. No cotton content is claimed.
Why is there no blue option in the variant list?
The blue in the product name describes the ink on the white colourway's back print. The option labels are graphic names — floral, spider, graffiti, half moon, colour-7, bear, smiley, plain and solid — in black or white bodies.
Does polyester shrink like cotton?
Buyers in one discussion describe polyester blends as avoiding shrinkage and holding shape better than cotton, which is why cotton shoppers often size up. Our five 30 °C washes left body length stable, but the finest print detail softened.
Reader extracts
5 approved
Reader score 3.8 / 5 (5 ratings)
Honest review, thanks. My experience mid — shirt itself is decent for the money but the variant names had me order wrong twice. Ended up with two of the same grey under different labels. If you're buying, just pick one and don't try to decode the list. Print quality varies a little between the three I got but nothing egregious.
quiet_consumer_77 3 / 5
Good breakdown. The weight number is what sold me — I'd been burned before by stuff listed as milk silk that came in at like 120gsm. Printing on the back was centered on mine, no complaints. Only thing is the blue reads darker in person than the listing photo, more navy than the bright blue shown. Still keeping it, still under four bucks.
DannyFromQueens 4 / 5
Put mine on three body types just like you did and honestly it worked on all of us. The blue printed one is the one I keep reaching for. Back print held up after a cold wash inside out. Nobody in my group chat believes the price until I show the tag. Wish the variant names matched the actual colours but that's a listing problem not a shirt problem.
marisolpl 5 / 5
The 39-label list is genuinely misleading, appreciate you calling that out. I bought two sizes up based on the chart and it was swimming on me. My fault partly but the labels don't help. Fabric is fine for the price, definitely a summer-only shirt, you can see light through it. Stitching at the hem on one of mine started going after two washes so keep that in mind.
Leon R. 3 / 5
Finally someone actually weighed the thing instead of just saying 'it's thin.' The milk-silk tag always gets me though — 39 colourway names and half of them are just different words for grey. Ordered the 'smoke' and 'slate' and they're the same shirt. Print registration on mine was fine, maybe half a millimetre off on the back text but you'd never notice on body. For $3.73 I'm not complaining, just wish the variant list wasn't a guessing game.
tee_hunter_kai 4 / 5